Red Strike - "ChadMontreal"

A place to view the strikes record, strikes issued and reasons why (if gifted)
Post Reply
User avatar
Nicky
Site Admin
Posts: 716
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2015 5:07 pm
Location: London, England
Contact:

Red Strike - "ChadMontreal"

Post by Nicky » Fri Dec 25, 2015 4:01 pm

Hi

I have issued Chad with a RED STRIKE as per recommendation from Mary due to his postings in the below thread:

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=645&start=10

Before I go into writing the main part of the strike thread up, I would like to say that I am in agreement with the reasons why Mary has felt it appropriate that this course of disciplinary action is to be taken. With regards to the below, my own writing will be in the normal BLACK colour, Chad's posting is in BLUE whilst Mary's is in PURPLE/PINK to help you in understanding the flow of the information.

Chad wrote:
I can't agree with you that I was being insincere mostly since I don't claim to be the path. As I stated in my introduction posts, I recognize that there is a great deal of truth about the true nature of love presented by AJ & Mary and I'm currently evaluating whether or not I want to make a sincere attempt to grow in love on the path, or if I want to use the wisdom the grow on the natural love path. It wasn't my intention to use this as an opportunity to grow in love, but rather to have a discussion about the principals of Divine Love.
From my perspective, I created the forum for the purpose of sincere people whom want to actively grow on the Divine Love path. This is written in the terms of use document quite clearly. Upon reading the above quoted section by Chad, I feel his current motivations and desire are out of harmony with the creation of this forum. I feel people who are sincere about Divine Truth and want to progress closer to God would not only want to utilise the gifts on offer here as an opportunity to grow in love BUT ALSO to have discussions about the principles of Divine Love hand in hand rather than selecting one reason over another to justify certain posts that they make. I feel if Chad was more honest with himself and wanted to act in ethics and morals (natural love), he would have remained as a "guest" based on his own current self expressed intentions rather than signing up to the forum to feed some of his addictions.

Mary stated the below to Chad:
You are argumentative, and insincere about actually communicating with others in a loving way. You knowingly ignore Jesus' previous feedback about your biggest block to growth and continue to act in it.

For example you state:

"If you're sure you would like to have this conversation...a word of warning/confession, when I met AJ in Philadelphia he was kind enough to share with me what he felt was my single biggest issue preventing me from growing in love. I don't remember exactly how he worded it, but the issue is that I have an ability to justify unloving behaviour to others and myself. He nailed it, I can justify just about anything"

So even though you know that you like to argument for argument's sake (and in an unloving way) you go ahead and do it anyway.

This demonstrates that you have not joined this forum with any sincerity to learn, grow or share and instead you are acting in your addictions in your posts (I don't have time at present to go into detail about the specific additions you are acting in, but this is not really even necessary, you are acting in addiction and you know it). This alone places you in breach of forum guidelines. You are purposefully sinning.
I totally agree with this and felt the same thing. I feel when you yourself are intellectually aware of a certain injury that is currently within your own soul, but then go ahead and act in the sin of the behaviour knowing (or maybe not) that it will cause pain and suffering to yourself and others, I would question how moral and ethical these actions are (from a Natural Love perspective, never mind from God's perspective). I feel what Chad has displayed above is a clear demonstration of a lack of humility and insincerity and is a great example of the difference between how much more dominant the soul (emotional) is over the mind (intellect), as no matter how much Chad tries to excuse and "dress up" his responses to Lena using words and intellect, if you are sensitive, you can still feel some of the soul based emotions coming from him (compulsion to justify, cause argument) which drove his actions.

Mary responded to Chad by stating the below:
"I would still put it out there that advertising is Law of Attraction since the advertisers are drawn by content & community and the actual acting on the advertisement is LoA."


"There's no question that advertising DOES exploit injuries of all kinds - but that's law of attraction. It's demented to capitalize on it, but the lessons are there."

Actually, using a person's injuries to manipulate others and to get things (monetary or otherwise) from them is NOT 'law of attraction'. It is taking a purposeful will based decision to act unlovingly and is exploitative.

A predator is a person who profits from the emotional injuries of others. You continue to justify these predatory actions within yourself and in your chosen job (whether or not you still do the job - you still emotionally justify it).

You are the kind of person who profits from the destruction of other people.
I would just like to add that I feel there is some arrogance from Chad here when stating what he feels the Law of Attraction is when it is quite some way off from the truth of how this law operates - Mary has corrected these statements. This is another example of the ways in which our current set of injuries affect our accurate soul based grasp (emotional) of Divine Truth principles.

It shows how "off" anyone can be when they only have formulated an intellectual idea of Divine Truth principles whilst the emotional errors remain which cause this to occur. It is the same when people misinterpret some of the statements that Jesus had stated in the first century based on their own emotional condition at the time of reading it and then gone on to act in the damage of the emotional sin that is within them thinking that they are doing the "right thing."

Finally, another forum member drew my attention to the below thread where Chad discussed the areas in which he feels Jesus & Mary are wilfully sinning:

viewtopic.php?f=55&t=334&p=2526#p2526

While I feel that I could provide a number of responses to a few of the points raised, I feel again that Chad is acting in his current addictions by desiring to post this information. He will feel that what he has posted is "valid" and has "innocent" intentions yet I cannot agree. There is a desire within him to intellectually find anything that does not sit well in his own understanding of Divine Truth as a way to justify to himself why he does not want to commit to the path at the moment - which is fine, it is his own prerogative to do this if he so wishes as we all have the gift of free will. However, I feel that by allowing him to post in this manner, it will have a negative impact on the sincere members here whom do want to progress sincerely before "proof" of the at-onement condition is displayed. Like I said at the start of this thread, he is currently out of harmony with my own intentions behind the reasons why I created the forum and I am exercising my own prerogative by deeming that his current actions do not have a place on this forum - I hope this makes sense to you Chad.

There is a compulsion driving this action and at this moment in time bearing in mind his current motivations and intentions, no matter what anybody would say in response to him, he would find a way to intellectually disprove (wrongly) what they are saying (to feed his addictions further) and dismiss any love & truth that may be shared with him.

Mary may write another post in this thread to provide more examples and considerations of what has gone on here in terms of "God's Way" that we can all learn from.

Thanks
Nicky

User avatar
Mary
DT Teacher
Posts: 174
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2015 11:56 pm
Location: Wilkesdale, QLD, Australia
Contact:

Re: Red Strike - "ChadMontreal"

Post by Mary » Sat Dec 26, 2015 9:37 am

I thought I would just add to this strike the private message that Chad wrote to me not long after I responded to him in the thread about Banner Advertising yesterday.
Peace out

Delete message
Report private message
Quote message

Sent: Fri Dec 25, 2015 2:29 pm
From: ChadMontreal
Recipient: Mary

Do you know see that you have been programmed to visciously fight off anyone who might help you see that you suffer form Stockholm syndrome?

I was watching your identity video where Eloisa interviewed you. When you were talking about "how you know" - you never mentioned all the friends you interact with in the spirit world and in the sleep state. That means you don't consider those eperiences to be real. My sister warned me about the situation when you were exposed for cheating on AJ in the sleep state - that's when she knew it was all scam and I see it clearly now too.

And by the way, before you get too self righteous about the kind of person I am. Take a look at how your accusation applies to your life - you LITERALLY exploit people by hooking them into their injuries. You say what you do is a gift, and yet you receive hundreds of thousands of dollars - and I've yet to meet or see anyone become more loving - including you. You should watch the video you did where you shamed the book group for not donating enough money. You used threats and bribery and you certainly weren't taking responsibility for you own "law of attraction" : you did NOT attract people who donated what you thought would be acceptable. You're the worst kind of predator.

The problem with what you do is it that it implants an imaginary world into people's minds and they get sucked into believing it's real. It's not real, it's crazy and I hope you get help.
This message only further demonstrates the points I made in my original response to Chad.

Despite joining the forum with a 'facade' of niceness and interest in discussing more about Divine Truth principles, this message displays what Chad really thinks of Jesus and I. He obviously harbours a huge amount of rage which was triggered as soon as his addictions were not met, he believes that I am programmed by Jesus, that Jesus and I exploit people, that we threaten and bribe others and that we implant an imaginary world into people's minds.

However Chad was not open or transparent about any of this when he joined the forum. This is incredibly false and dishonest. While I don't feel it is necessary to defend or justify my actions or my life to someone with the kinds of emotions and intentions that Chad has at the moment, no matter what accusations he makes against Jesus and I, we don’t operate in the same way that he does. I don't attack others or operate on false pretenses and I honour truth with others because I know that this is the loving way to behave. And I will certainly continue to stand up and speak up when I can see and feel that people are on this forum, such as Chad, whose only desire is to attack or undermine others in their relationship with God.

And while Chad accuses Jesus and I of making money immorally, he still ignores the fact that he makes a living by preying on people’s sexual injuries, by being involved in the production and sale of pornography.

These issues are all issues that Jesus and I have raised with Chad in previous years in an effort to assist him but he still chooses to ignore and deny them.

User avatar
Nicky
Site Admin
Posts: 716
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2015 5:07 pm
Location: London, England
Contact:

Re: Red Strike - "ChadMontreal"

Post by Nicky » Sat Dec 26, 2015 5:11 pm

After reading the private correspondence that Chad had sent through to Mary as seen above, I have no choice but to ban him from the forum (previously it was just a mute).

Upon receiving feedback, he dropped his facade and went out on "attack mode" towards Mary & Jesus. Of course, this projection of rage and attack constitutes a ban regardless of whether done in public or in private messaging on the forum.

Thanks
Nicky

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 1 guest